• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Friends of Louis Jacobs

Registered UK Charity No 1139099

t. +44 (0)7714 894 781
e. Click here to email us directly

  • Home
  • Louis Jacobs
    • Reason To Believe Biography & News
    • Biographical portraits & details
    • Obituaries
    • Bibliography
  • Community
    • New West End Synagogue
    • New London Synagogue
    • Chabad case
    • Interviews
    • Thoughts & Readers Contributions
  • The Affair
    • Primary Sources
    • Media coverage
    • Defamatory press
    • Aftermath of the Affair
  • Scholarly Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Essays & Dissertations
    • Oxford Orthodoxy Seminar
  • News & Events
    • Events
    • Honest Theology Project
    • The Seven Deadly Sins
    • Study Groups
    • Editor’s Blog
    • Quest Videos
    • News
    • Events Archive
  • Join/Donate
    • Join
    • Contact Us
    • Make a donation
You are here: Home / Reviews of Louis Jacobs’s books / The Talmudic Argument / A Review of ‘The Talmudic Argument’

A Review of ‘The Talmudic Argument’

The Talmudic Argument. A Study in Talmudic Reasoning and Methodology. By Louis Jacobs. Pp. xvi + 220. Cambridge University Press, 1984. £25.00.

Louis Jacobs here provides an immensely rewarding exposition of nineteen Talmudic sugyot, combining the traditional yeshiva emphasis on the content and flow of the argument with a concern for the basic literary-historical questions of the editing of the Talmud. The author has made notable contributions to both approaches in the past, not least in his earliest work, Studies in Talmudic Logic and Methodology. Two introductory chapters describe the character of Talmudic argument, viewing it as a technical species of a genre of ‘sustained argument’ which has ‘strong antecedents’ in earlier Jewish sources. The notion of a ‘sustained argument’, however, is left somewhat too general to make the comparisons very revealing. So too, perhaps, when the author sees in a host of biblical dialogues a ‘dialectical tone’ which finds its way into the Talmud. Talmudic argument makes use, in a highly formalized style, of a finite repertoire of argumentative ‘moves’, its uniqueness resulting not merely from the ingenuity with which these moves are deployed, but also the literary skill which characterizes the construction of entire arguments. It is the author’s claim that the overall logical structure of these entire arguments is such that the Talmud must be regarded as essentially the creation of its final editors, notwithstanding the earlier literary strata which can be identified within it. The Saboraic editors did not receive this structure, and merely make final additions to it; whatever the extent of the earlier traditions they received it was they who moulded them into their present form. The Talmud is neither a ‘Hansard’, a verbatim account of oral rebate, nor the end result of a long history of written transmission

Filed Under: The Talmudic Argument

Scholarly Reviews

  • Reviews of Louis Jacobs’s books
  • Essays & Dissertations
  • Arguments for Heaven’s Sake: Oxford Orthodoxy Seminar
©2023 Friends of Louis Jacobs
Privacy Policy & Cookies